/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) scientific writing (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: scientific writing
Is in goldstandard
1
paper corpusSignostxt261 - : Romberger, J. (2000). Teaching scientific writing conventions: Learning to write is an integral part of writing to learn in the Sciences [en línea] . Disponible en: [60]http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/WAC/abstract.html [ [61]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato scientific writing:
scientific writing
Lengua:
Frec: 39
Docs: 20
Nombre propio: / 39 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.158 = ( + (1+0) / (1+5.32192809488736)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| scientific writing |
: 29. Salager-Meyer, F. (1999). Referential behavior in scientific writing: A diachronic study (1810-1995). English for Specific Purposes, 18 ( 3), 279-305. : Castelló, M., Iñesta, A. & Corcelles, M. (2013). Ph. D. students’ transitions between academic and scientific writing identity: Learning to write a research article. Research in the Teaching of Writing, 47(4), 442-477. : Feldman, S., Anderson, V. & Mangurian, L. (2001). Teaching effective scientific writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(7), 446-450. : Gopen, G. & Swan, J. (1990). The Science of scientific writing [en línea]. Disponible en: [45]http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/23947?fulltext=true&print=yes : Hunston, S. (1993). Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In Ghadessy, M. (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57-73). London: Pinter Publishers. : Hyland, Ken e Françoise Salager-Meyer. 2008. Scientific writing, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42: 297-338. : Kolikant, Y., Gatchell, D., Hirsch, P. & Linsenmeier, R. (2006). A cognitive-apprenticeship-inspired instructional approach for teaching scientific writing and reading. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(3), 20-25. : Lerner, N. & Ogren-Balkama, M. (2007). Teaching scientific writing [en línea]. Disponible en: [53]http://appl003.lsu.edu/acadaff/cxcweb.nsf/$Content/Summer+Institute+Materials/$file/SI_05--Lerner--Writing_1.pdf : Moskowich, I. & Crespo, B. (2014). Stance in present scientific writing, indeed. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of English scientific writing. TOKEN. A Journal of English Linguistics, 3, 91-113. : Rice, R. (1998). Scientific writing: A course to improve the writing of science students. Journal of College Science, 27(4), 267-273. : Richardson, A. S. (2005). Logical fallacies in scientific writing. Recuperado de: [101]http://www. cs.auckland.ac.nz/~cristian/i2rcs/i2rcs_docs/logic.html : Taavitsainen, I. & Pahta, P. (2013). The corpus of early English Medical writing (1375- 1800): A register-specific diachronic corpus for studying the history of scientific writing. In A. Meurman-Solin, V. Marttila, C. Suhr & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Digital editing. Helsinki: Varieng. : [98]Hyland, Ken e Françoise Salager-Meyer. 2008. Scientific writing, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42: 297-338. : Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2020). A disciplinary analysis of fairly in late modern English scientific writing. In M. L. Carrió-Pastor (Ed.),Corpus Analysis in Different Genres: Academic Discourse and Learner Corpora(pp. 93-107). New York: Routledge. |